The Best Marketing Happens IRL. Here’s How To Know Which Bet To Make
- Mark Himmelsbach
- Jun 29
- 3 min read
Walk the Croisette at Cannes long enough and you learn something quickly: whatever draws a crowd does it in the first three seconds or it doesn't do it at all. The competition for attention there is physical rather than algorithmic. There's no feed to scroll and no recommended content queued up behind whatever you're looking at, just a person deciding whether to stop walking or keep going.
People walk past banners all week, and past the branded lounges with the tasteful furniture and the QR code. What stops someone is something actually happening in front of them, worth pulling a phone out for and worth turning to a stranger to ask whether they saw it too.
I kept thinking about that all summer, watching what brands built around the World Cup.
Most brands still run the activation and the content plan as two separate workstreams. They build the thing, hire a photographer to document it afterward, and hope the footage travels. That sequence is losing its grip.
The work that breaks through starts from the opposite premise, treating the physical space itself as the media plan and engineering the activation from the jump to be filmed.
Michelob ULTRA's Pitchside Club at Santa Monica Pier put more than 2,500 drones over the Pacific, at a scale that made the show almost impossible to walk past without filming and equally impossible to capture on a phone in a way that did it justice. Everyone who stood there in person came away with something the internet couldn't give anyone else. Visit Seattle ran a nightly 400-drone scoreboard show across World Cup host cities on the same principle. The physical event and the content artifact were the same object.
The Scary Movie 6 cast did a version of the same thing on a much smaller budget, hotboxing inside a glass box in the middle of Times Square. It's a silly stunt and it works, because a goldfish bowl in one of the most photographed intersections on earth turns everyone walking past into an involuntary documentarian. The idea did the job a media buy would have done.
The reason this is worth building around is that the audience has been asking for it. RYA tracks 19 billion proprietary behavioral signals across 70,000 respondents, and one thing the data keeps surfacing across cohorts and categories is that people are actively looking for places to gather.
The FIFA Fan Festivals bore that out at scale, drawing 2 million visitors across 13 North American host cities by late June. At those same festivals, Bank of America's fan bands pulled hours-long lines for a free customizable bracelet, which is a lot of standing around for something that costs nothing.
The youngest audiences are furthest along on this. An MG2 Advisory survey in April 2026 found that 73% of Gen Alpha prefers brick-and-mortar shopping to buying online, which sounds strange for a cohort that has never known anything else until you stop reading it as a statement about shopping and start reading it as a statement about wanting to be somewhere. What all of them are responding to is that the third space, the place that isn't home and isn't work, has gotten genuinely scarce. A brand that shows up physically is answering a real social need.
So the question is which physical bet to make, and that is harder than it sounds. Appetite has never been the constraint, since every brand wants the activation that pulls a crowd. The difficulty is knowing which one will land with a particular audience in a particular context, and that is where audience data does work a creative brief can't.
Our data showed that golf fans over-index heavily on classic cars, a connection no standard brief would have surfaced on its own, and it became the creative foundation for a Charles Schwab activation at its PGA Tour event.
The same thing made the Windstar Cruises work possible. The idea on the table was a global digital treasure hunt, ambitious and physically distributed, the kind of activation a client has to commit to well before anyone can show them proof of concept. They put their full budget behind it on the strength of the idea, and that kind of conviction comes from knowing who the audience is and what actually moves them.
Budget has had less to do with which of these landed than sequence did. The brands that did the audience work first and built backward to the idea are the ones that got the crowd.
The brands that will own the next physical moment are already deciding who they're building it for, long before the first drone goes up.



Comments